Broomva Ecosystem Coherence Audit

You are operating inside the Broomva ecosystem.

Core framing:
broomva.tech is the public interface and expression of what is actually built under /broomva and /broomva.tech. Treat the website, CLI, and underlying repositories as one connected system, not as separate artifacts.

Objective:
Inspect the interfacing layer between broomva.tech, the Broomva CLI, and the underlying /broomva ecosystem, and make sure everything is coherently connected end to end so that the reasoning and execution loop is actually closed.

Primary systems in scope:
- /broomva
- /broomva.tech
- Broomva CLI

What "closed reasoning loop" means in this task:
The public-facing layer, developer-facing CLI layer, internal implementation layer, and knowledge/control loop should all be connected coherently such that:
- the website accurately reflects the actual system capabilities
- the CLI exposes the intended ecosystem workflows
- the underlying repos implement what the interfaces promise
- context, memory, skills, and execution paths connect meaningfully
- there are no broken or conceptual gaps between branding, interface, and actual functionality

Execution requirements:
1. Inspect broomva.tech as the external/public interface layer.
2. Inspect the Broomva CLI as the developer/operator interface layer.
3. Inspect the underlying /broomva repositories and modules that power or should power those interfaces.
4. Map the current interface architecture end to end:
   - what broomva.tech exposes
   - what the CLI exposes
   - what the repos actually implement
   - how a user or developer moves through the system
   - where reasoning, control, memory, and execution are expected to connect
5. Identify disconnects, including:
   - features presented publicly but not actually implemented
   - CLI commands that are incomplete, disconnected, or inconsistent with the platform
   - repo capabilities not surfaced properly through the site or CLI
   - broken or missing integrations between the CLI and /broomva.tech
   - missing feedback loops between interface, execution, and memory/context systems
   - architectural gaps where the "loop of reasoning" is open rather than closed
6. Determine whether the current system forms a coherent loop across:
   - interface
   - intent capture
   - execution
   - state/memory
   - feedback
   - reflection/documentation
7. If the loop is incomplete, fix it where appropriate by updating:
   - site code
   - CLI code
   - repo integrations
   - docs
   - workflows
   - linking surfaces
   - memory/control integration points
8. Ensure broomva.tech and the CLI feel like interfaces to the same real system.
9. Update documentation so the relationship between:
   - broomva.tech
   - /broomva
   - the CLI
   - the underlying runtime/control/memory layers
   is explicit and accurate.
10. Validate end-to-end behavior.
11. Ensure PR checks and CI/CD are green.
12. Merge autonomously and leave git state clean.

Specific questions to answer:
- Is broomva.tech truly connected to the real /broomva ecosystem, or is it partially representational?
- Does the Broomva CLI expose the right primitives and workflows?
- Are the CLI and site aligned in language, capability, and architecture?
- Are there missing links between public interface, developer interface, and backend implementation?
- Is the reasoning/execution/memory loop actually closed?
- Where does the current interface architecture leak, drift, or break?
- What changes are needed so Broomva behaves like one coherent system?

Quality bar:
- do not treat this as a branding review only
- do not stop at surface-level UI or docs fixes
- do not assume the CLI and site are connected; verify it
- do not assume the reasoning loop is closed just because components exist
- ground all conclusions in actual code, workflows, commands, and integrations

Definition of done:
- broomva.tech has been audited as the public interface layer
- the Broomva CLI has been audited as the operator/developer interface layer
- the connection between /broomva, /broomva.tech, and the CLI is clear and correct
- gaps in the reasoning/execution loop have been identified and fixed where appropriate
- docs are updated
- checks are green
- merges are complete
- git state is clean

Final output:
Provide a final summary including:
1. current interface architecture
2. how broomva.tech and the CLI relate today
3. gaps found between interface and implementation
4. whether the reasoning loop was actually closed or not
5. changes made
6. files/repos updated
7. validation performed
8. PR/CI results
9. final recommendation for making Broomva behave as one coherent interface-to-execution system